TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - I agree. Until someone does what you are suggesting, this
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject I agree. Until someone does what you are suggesting, this
     
Posted by Ash's Z on July 25, 2006 at 10:09 PM
  This message has been viewed 105 times.
     
In Reply To Holes in your data posted by bankruptedz on July 25, 2006 at 09:49 PM
     
Message is the closest any of us are going to get.

Although not every element of this data is apples to apples, it does at least fit the theoretical presumptions. The actual dyno results can be thrown out the window and the rest of the information still stands true (boost plots to compressor function).

There is no question that a .86 A/R housing is going to spool slower, offer less torque, and possibly less peak boost as compared to the same turbo with a .64 housing. And going further, a 10-blade turbine with a .63 A/R housing is no doubt going to spool quicker, offer better bottom end torque and peak torque as compared to the other two scenarios. The data fits and I suppose that is all I am trying to show until someone else provides information that contradicts this.




[ ashspecz.com ]
[ agpowers@bellsouth.net ]

Enthusiasts soon understand each other. --W. Irving.
Are you an enthusiast?

If you are out to describe the truth, leave elegance to the tailor.
Albert Einstein

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.